Showing posts with label safe words. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safe words. Show all posts

Sunday, July 5, 2015

#BDSM - When No means No and Stop means Stop - #Bloghop2015 - July 5-11, 2015


BDSM Bloghop 2015

Bondage & Discipline, Domination & submission, Sadism & Masochism
BDSM encompasses so many things. It’s understandable why someone who has never participated in it might be confused about what it truthfully entails. We’d like to set that straight. For every person involved in what we call the Lifestyle, there’s a different way of doing things. However, no matter where you go, you’ll encounter a few basic tenets and the folks who are participating in our blog hop would like to show you how some of these things really work. So, please join us!
The hop will last a full week and some of our participants will be posting more than once throughout the week, so make sure you check back for more (or, better yet, sign up to follow the lovely folks participating, they’ve got great stuff!).
If you would like to participate, we’d love to have you!

Kathryn's Rules: Before we get to my article, I'd like to announce that I'm offering one commenter a choice between any one of my eBooks. Please check my sidebar for the available titles with links to excerpts for each one. To qualify, make sure you leave your name and e-mail address in the comment, so I have a way to contact you, and tell me why you enjoy romances with BDSM themes.

Note: This hop includes a Rafflecopter Giveaway. Please see the sign-up below. You do not need to enter the Rafflecopter to be eligible for my giveaway, but you do need to enter for the grand prize.

The following article on safewords may be preaching to the choir. But if you're interesting in trying BDSM, I suggest you read the importance of safety.


Feeling Safe When You Don't Want to be In Control
BDSM can be a world of contradictions. A submissive by nature wants to hand over all control to her Dominant (I'm using female submissive vs. male Dominant for expediency, not because I feel this is the only true combination in BDSM. It's not.) A submissive wants to trust her Dominant to know exactly how far to take her so she goes just beyond her comfort zone. She wants to give herself over to him so he has all the responsibility for their scene. He determines, what, when and how she is to accept without question.
I write romance, and often in my stories the hero is nearly psychic in understanding his submissive's needs. Unfortunately, in real life very few people are psychic. So, to play responsibly, both parties need to negotiate and set their limits. One of the ways they can do this is to establish a series of safewords or signals that allow the submissive to communicate her current state of being to the Dominant. But even safewords aren't infallible, and some submissives don't like using them, primarily because they make her feel as if she's the responsible party, and that's not what she wants or needs. A Dominant can call a safeword, too, especially when he suspects the submissive isn't in the right mindset for the scene, or he feels they've gone as far as he is comfortable taking her.


Knowing Your Limits
Trust is the key. Both the submissive and her Dominant need to be able to trust each other to stop their play from going too far. This can be a problem because by nature a submissive desires to please her Dominant, so she feels calling a halt to their play is a failure for her. She sees herself as being weak if she safewords, so she will push herself past her “comfort” zone to please her partner. 
This may allow a submissive partner to expand her boundaries and learn what she is capable of withstanding, but it may also expose her to severe risk if those limits are pushed too far. Additionally, many dominant partners may interpret the use of a safeword as a failure on their own part, (i.e., failing to understand body language, to know their partner, or loss of control.) Neither the submissive nor the Dominant should be considered wrong or at fault for using a safeword.


I believe safewords should be considered “no-fault” so that participants don't feel guilty using them. Discouraging the use of safewords runs the risk of scenes becoming non-consensual, harming trust between partners and potentially damaging to the individual's mental and emotional state.
A Dominant or Top will often make it clear beforehand that he will not agree to a scene if he fears the submissive will not safeword as soon as she needs to. This reluctance puts the submissive in the position of enduring more than she wants to, or should, simply to avoid disappointing her Top. Submissives need to keep in mind that a good Dominant will be far more upset if he unknowingly inflicts psychological trauma on his submissive than he will if she calls a stop to their play. Tops are human, too, and are just as susceptible to "top-drop" as submissives are to "sub-drop." 
Each of us has limits or boundaries that deserve to be respected. No one else can tell you how much pain or humiliation you are comfortable receiving or dispensing. Individuals need to decide for themselves where their line is drawn, be they Dominant or submissive. Knowing and respecting your limits is essential for a successful scene. Using a virtual safety net in play doesn't mean the submissive is "topping from the bottom," it means the play is no longer meeting her needs. BDSM is meant to allow participants to find pleasure through kink. Finding only misery is self-defeating, even if you're a masochist.


Safe, Sane and Consensual vs. Risk-Aware Consensual Kink
The key word here is consensual, which leads us to the concept of consensual non-consent. Safewords of BDSM fall under the guiding philosophy of safe, sane and consensual. Those who practice the more permissive philosophy of risk-aware consensual kink may abandon the use of safewords, especially those partners who practice forms of edgeplay or extreme forms of dominance and submission. In such cases, the choice to give up the use of safewords is a consensual act on the part of the bottom or submissive. Because of the inherent risks involved, abandoning safewords should only be practiced by partners who know each other's limits intimately. If the play partner is new to you, please be responsible enough to establish your limits beforehand through the use of safewords or hand signals.
As was mentioned before, a safeword is usually used by the submissive, but can be used by all participants in a scene, including Dominants, dungeon masters at play parties, and sometimes even observers. For example, a submissive may misbehave intentionally to indicate her desire for harsher treatment, and sometimes a Dominant will need to safeword to let his submissive know the scene has gone too far for him to feel comfortable continuing. Or, a third party observing a scene may have the ability to spot something dangerous going on that both the Top and bottom have missed, and need to stop the scene to point it out. Either way, the primary concern is safety, especially for the partner on the receiving end, but not even safewords are infallible.


When Safewords Fail
Here are some reasons why safewords fail:
The bottom can't form words. Many bottoms are rendered non-verbal by S&M experiences, even mild bondage or light spanking. This is part of the appeal of being a bottom; your mind shifts out of its normal patterns. And most bottoms are non-verbal in physiological subspace, which is an altered state. 
The bottom can't remember the safeword. If she's never had to use it in distress, it probably won't come naturally to her. 
The bottom doesn't want to disappoint her Top. If the bottom is submissive towards her top in a more general way, she may be more focused on "being good" than her own safety, even if the latter is his highest priority. Calling out the special word that short-circuits her lover's authority may be anathema to her. 
The bottom doesn't realize she's in trouble. Her judgment is clouded, and her sensations are all different. She might realize that something's not right, but think it's really not all that bad.
The Top doesn't recognize the safeword. If he hasn't heard the bottom yell or whisper or groan the word before, it might not register with him when uttered that way during a scene. He might even mistake it for an expression of ecstasy!
The Top is in a groove at that moment. Maybe she's screaming in just the way he wants to hear. Maybe what he's doing feels really good to him. Maybe he's in topspace.  He needs to hear something that will jar him out of his groove.
So what to do? The safest way to play is for Top and bottom to agree that any request to help or halt is the signal to stop:
No. Wait. Help. Stop. Enough. Hold on. Uncle. Let me go. I can't take this.
Even an unusual or unexpected response to pain can be a signal, (e.g. crying out "Ow!" after a period of moaning.)
Note: a designated safeword is essential if you play verbal games during a scene, where the bottom gets to say, "No! Stop!" and the Top is supposed to keep right on going. This deepens the sense of taboo, without crossing the line. As I mentioned above, such games should be played only with partners you're very familiar with. Even then, the participants should select an obvious word like "safeword" or simply "safe", and find ways to practice it together before playing the scene for real.
Though it is the Top's responsibility to be aware of his partner's state, regardless of what she says or doesn't say, the submissive has a responsibility as well to assure the top she's okay when he checks in with her. 






a Rafflecopter giveaway

Friday, April 13, 2012

Frisky Friday - BDSM - Who is responsible for setting the limits?


I originally published this article in February, 2012.  In it I had a link to Kitty Stryker's article in "Good Vibrations Magazine."  Unfortunately, this link was causing a warning to come up on my blog because the Good Vibrations site has been flagged for spreading Malware.  I had a very difficult day finding my links and deleting them.  As a result, I deleted this entire post.  Because I feel it's important to share, I'm reposting it today.  I found another posting of Kitty's article on her Safe/Ward site, so I'm providing that link as well as a few others I've found.



There have been several posts going around the BDSM community recently surrounding questions of limits, safe words and abuse.  When is a Dom merely pushing a sub's limits, versus when is he abusing her trust?  A fine line?  Perhaps.  But it's one that needs to be drawn nonetheless.

What drew me to this topic, which is undoubtedly more serious than frisky, was a post made by Sir J on the "Nature of Limits" in his blog: What does it mean to be a Dominant.  It is a very informative post (as are the comments left by several in the community) that states the Dom is the individual responsible for setting the limits in a D/s relationship.  Because if he has them, by extension, the sub will as well. But I'm not sure that is sufficient.  The sub really needs to know her own limits also.  Sir J is not disputing this; in fact he agrees that all subs should have limits.  So, even though the notion that a sub should put aside her own feelings and needs in order to make her Dominant happy sounds ideal, in real life such an attitude can be dangerous as well as subsequently very unhealthy for the submissive.


Kitty Stryker, a former submissive who posted an article titled "I Never Called it Rape" on her blog PurrVersatility, details some of her own experiences where she was either urged into doing things, which she viewed as violating her consent, or subjected to unwanted handling because that was what her Dom desired.  I'm sure Kitty's case is not unique, but what is upsetting about the post is her certainty that the community, in general, is not on the sub's side in such matters.  This, in turn, left her feeling victimized. Instead of knowing she would be supported or provided with much needed resources and comfort, the sub, Kitty in this case, is convinced the community would shun her for complaining when they assume she "volunteered" her body to the Dominant in question by just being with him.


In erotic fiction this is referred to as "dubious consent."  In such situations, women like Kitty deserve protection, and care, not ostracism.  It doesn't matter if the Dom believed his actions were not only appropriate, but desired, he misread his sub.  The mere fact that Kitty felt violated but was afraid to admit it out of fear of being banned if she called out to a dungeon monitor for help, or pegged as a "drama queen" for using her safe word, is not good for the community at large. Because BDSM is intended to push boundaries and limits, those practicing it need to ensure their submissives are not feeling abused.  Note: I said "feeling."  It is the state of mind that matters most here.  A sub should always feel safe even when she's having her limits and boundaries stretched. And a sub who claims she has no limits, especially when the Dom is new to her, should be watched and supervised by the group much more carefully than a sub who openly states her limits.


DannahB said as much in her insightful post on Subtypical in her article, Think, Choose, Submit when she posted, a sub that is willing to engage in play or is extremely submissive immediately upon introduction is a red flag for any knowledgeable Dom.  Yes, the onus is on the sub to know herself and to choose her Dom wisely, but she's human and she can make mistakes.  If she does, shouldn't she be given support rather than censure?  If she intimates her experience was less enjoyable than she desired, shouldn't she be heard and cared for rather than simply dismissed?  I realize such caring and support may only be practical in fiction, but shouldn't it be just as important in real life?  I think it should, but then again, this is just one romance author's opinion.  I now return you to frolic and surf about the web, and wish you a very frisky, but safe, sane and consensual Friday.

Wanted to add a blog article by Kitty Thomas on this subject entitled "Who Has the Power" as well as a few of other blogs that address the subject of abuse in the BDSM community:

Friday, March 9, 2012

Frisky Friday - Submissives vs. Slaves


In my BDSM romances, all my heroes are Doms with submissives, not Masters with slaves.  Jim, my hero in my WIP "A Dom's Dilemma," comes closest to being a master with a slave when he insists Kelly assume a slave role prior to a really harsh punishment.  But other than that one time, he's really pretty lenient as far as Doms go, and he gives her a lot more leeway than most Doms would.  That said, I've been reading several books lately that deal with Master/slave relationships.  Only the slaves in these books are victims of human trafficking, which has significantly wounded them both mentally and physically.


The first book I want to talk about is Slave (Finding Anna) by Sherri Hayes.  I found Sherri's book during my Six Sentence Sunday trolling and bought it almost immediately after reading her six sentences.  Sherri is planning an entire series, which is good since the first book left me in serious limbo.  It didn't have "The End" or even "End of Part I" the way Fifty Shades did, so I  immediately went searching for more information (and to see if another book might be available) and found the blog site she has created for her Finding Anna series. She also has a Facebook page where she provides regular progress updates.  Below are Sherri's Six Sentences and a blurb for Slave from Goodreads:

"Get dressed and come to the living room, please."

And then he was gone. I was more confused than ever. He wanted me to get dressed  and come to the living room?

Then I got it. He was getting rid of me!


     Stephan has lived the lifestyle of a Dominant for five years. After several rebellious teenage years, it gave him the stability and control he had been seeking after his parent’s death.
     As president of a not-for-profit foundation, he knows what his future holds and what he wants out of life. All that changes when a simple lunch with his college friend and Mentor, Darren, leads him to buying a slave.

     Thrust into a situation he never thought he’d be in, Stephan can’t walk away. He is compelled to help this girl in the only way he knows how. 
     Brianna knows only one thing, she is a slave. She has nothing. She is nothing. 
     Can Stephan help Brianna realize that she is much more than just a Slave?

Sherri has come out, along with a lot of other authors, against the Today segment on "Fifty Shades of Grey."  It is Dr. Drew Pinske in particular that has drawn everyone's ire.  He said, "Erotic Novels: are they fantasy or just plain violent?"  He said this in addition to his statement admitting he hadn't even read the books.  Since I didn't see this segment on the Today show, I am reticent to give my point of view, but I will say from what I have read on this topic that there is great cause for concern, especially considering the recent brouhaha over Paypal's newest restrictions.  If you aren't aware of either of these issues and want to know more, please visit Dr. Logan Levkoff's post on the Huffington Post and Andrew Shaffer's article also on the Huffington Post regarding Paypal.



Human trafficking is a real and present danger, even though many people aren't aware it still exists.  It is also a serious topic and one that Sherri deals with in a very realistic, yet sensitive, way.  Another author who has taken on this challenge is Cherise Sinclair in her "Masters of the Shadowlands" series.  The latest "To Command and Collar" goes much more deeply into the the damage incurred when a woman is abducted and forced into slavery against her will.  It is a lot grittier than her other books, and Raoul (whose enjoyment with whipping surprised me after his brief aftercare scene with Gabrielle in Make Me, Sir) is much more a Master than a Dom in my opinion, so the ending of this book left me a little unsettled.

The following is the blurb on Amazon for "To Command and Collar"

     Determined to find the human traffickers preying on Shadowlands’ submissives, Master Raoul gets himself invited to a small slave auction. Once informed, the FBI orders him to reject the limited choices so the slavers will invite him to the big auction. To Raoul’s shock, one of the slaves is the kidnapped friend of a Shadowlands sub. She has a scarred body...and an unbroken spirit. He can’t leave her behind. Ruining the FBI’s carefully laid plans, he buys her.
     Kimberly’s freedom has come at a devastating price: the other women are still slaves. An FBI raid is their only hope for rescue. Desperate to help the Feds locate the big auction, she agrees to pose as Master Raoul’s slave. Wearing a collar again is terrifying, but under the powerful dominant’s care, Kim starts to heal and then to blossom. This is what she’s been drawn to—and fled from—her entire life.
     She escaped the slavers who captured her body—can she escape the master who’s captured her heart?

Although Kimberly's spirit wasn't broken anywhere to the extent that Brianna's was in Slave, she was far from being the young, carefree spirited young woman she had been before she was captured.


However, the difference between women who were captured and forced into slavery against their will and those who willingly submit to a master out of devotion is comparable to the difference between "hate and disgust" and "desire and need."  So, when you consider willing submission only, I've always viewed the dissimilarities between slaves and submissives to be a matter of degree in regards to the power exchange between them.  Masters and slaves have Total Power Exchanges, while Doms and submissives seem more like part-timers to me.  Dominants and submissives have safewords, where participants of TPE usually do not.  They have limits, where once again participants in TPE don't.  Part of my confusion stems from the fact that Masters and Slaves are also referred to as Dominants and Submissives, while to me they are not the same at all.  So, is it merely a matter of degree, or do the differences between slaves and submissives reach a far deeper level?  I'd be interested in any thoughts or opinions you might have.

In the meantime, if books about BDSM slaves in captivity interest you, check out the list on Goodreads BDSM Slave/Captive Stories.  Have a safe, sane and consenual Friday